505 Clark Drive - DP-2019-00105

Simcic & Uhrich Architects has applied to the City of Vancouver for permission to develop on this site:

    • interior alterations and to change the use from a Print Shop to a Manufacturing use (Brewery), with ancillary retail, office and tasting room, and to alter the mezzanine area, for this existing (one-storey with mezzanine) Industrial building on this site;
      • Floor Space Ratio of 0.8 (9,655.2 sq. ft.); and
      • peak height – no change to existing building.


Under the site’s existing I-2 zoning, the application is “conditional” so it may be permitted; however, it requires the decision of the Director of Planning.

We welcome your written comments (letter or e-mail) on this development application. Comments should be received on, or before May 29 , 2019, to be included in the staff review. However, comments will be considered up until the date of decision.


Application

 

Contact: Dallas Arcangel , Project Coordinator, dallas.arcangel@vancouver.ca , 604.871.6857

To assist you, a Glossary of key technical terms and a brief explanation of the application process is posted on our website at: vancouver.ca/devapps

In reviewing this application, and before making a decision, the Director of Planning will also need to consider City by-law regulations, and Council-adopted policies and guidelines. Once a full application review is completed, a decision will be made.

Copies of City by-law regulations, policies and guidelines are available at the City's website at https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/land-use-and-development-policies-and-guidelines.aspx or at the Development and Building Services Centre (1st Floor, 515 West 10th Avenue).

Please note that all comments and responses to this notification are subject to, and may be released, pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The Act does, however, protect your privacy by prohibiting disclosure of personal information (such as names, addresses and other identifying information) where such a disclosure would be an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy.

‹‹‹ go back