369 Boundary Road (formerly 3683 E Hastings Street) - DP-2019-00169

Arcus Consulting Ltd. has applied to the City of Vancouver for permission to develop on this site consisting of:

Interior alterations and change the use of the existing fitness centre at the 1st floor and existing offices on 3rd and 4th floor to Secondary School in this existing 4-storey mixed-use building providing 32 parking spaces and 6 spaces dedicated to pick-up and drop-off for the proposed school having vehicular access from East Hastings Street.

Under the site’s existing C-2C zoning, the application is “conditional” so it may be permitted; however, it requires the decision of the Director of Planning.

We welcome your written comments (letter or e-mail) on this development application. Comments should be received on, or before February 12, 2020, to be included in the staff review. However, comments will be considered up until the date of decision.



Contact: Peivand Sheikhakbari , Project Coordinator,  peivand.sheikhakbari@vancouver.ca , 604.871.6001

To assist you, a Glossary of key technical terms and a brief explanation of the application process is posted on our website at: vancouver.ca/devapps

In reviewing this application, and before making a decision, the Director of Planning will also need to consider City by-law regulations, and Council-adopted policies and guidelines. Once a full application review is completed, a decision will be made.

Copies of City by-law regulations, policies and guidelines are available at the City's website at https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/land-use-and-development-policies-and-guidelines.aspx or at the Development and Building Services Centre (1st Floor, 515 West 10th Avenue).

Please note that all comments and responses to this notification are subject to, and may be released, pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The Act does, however, protect your privacy by prohibiting disclosure of personal information (such as names, addresses and other identifying information) where such a disclosure would be an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy.

‹‹‹ go back