3327 Kingsway - DP-2019-00830

Ankenman Marchand Architects has applied to the City of Vancouver for permission to develop a four-storey mixed use building containing one Commercial Retail Unit on the first storey and 12 Secured Market Rental Dwelling Units on the first through fourth storeys, having approximate:

    • FSR (Floor Space Ratio) of 2.4 FSR (8,865 sq. ft.);
    • Overall Height of 47.0 ft. (facing Kingsway); and
    • three (3) surface parking spaces with access from the rear lane.


Under the site’s existing C-2 zoning, the application is “conditional” so it may be permitted; however, it requires the decision of the Director of Planning.

We welcome your written comments (letter or e-mail) on this development application. Comments should be received on, or before January 2 , 2020, to be included in the staff review. However, comments will be considered up until the date of decision.


Application

Contact: Cody Profili, Project Coordinator, cody.profili@vancouver.ca, 604.829.9237

To assist you, a Glossary of key technical terms and a brief explanation of the application process is posted on our website at: vancouver.ca/devapps

In reviewing this application, and before making a decision, the Director of Planning will also need to consider City by-law regulations, and Council-adopted policies and guidelines. Once a full application review is completed, a decision will be made.

Copies of City by-law regulations, policies and guidelines are available at the City's website at https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/land-use-and-development-policies-and-guidelines.aspx or at the Development and Building Services Centre (1st Floor, 515 West 10th Avenue).

Please note that all comments and responses to this notification are subject to, and may be released, pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The Act does, however, protect your privacy by prohibiting disclosure of personal information (such as names, addresses and other identifying information) where such a disclosure would be an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy.

‹‹‹ go back